Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. United States

113 F. Supp. 676, 1953 U.S. Claims LEXIS 2
CourtUnited States Court of Claims
DecidedJuly 13, 1953
DocketNo. 92-53
StatusPublished

This text of 113 F. Supp. 676 (Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. United States, 113 F. Supp. 676, 1953 U.S. Claims LEXIS 2 (cc 1953).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On the basis of the decision in this court in the case of Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United States, 101 F.Supp. 889, 121 Ct.Cl. 467, plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment to the extent that it asks for an adjudication that the jeeps herein involved should be classified and rated as passenger motor vehicles, is granted.

Entry of judgment is suspended pending the filing of a report by the General Accounting Office and the disposition of the issues relating to the proper amount to be paid to the plaintiff for the transportation services involved in this action.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United States
101 F. Supp. 889 (Court of Claims, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 F. Supp. 676, 1953 U.S. Claims LEXIS 2, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chesapeake-ohio-railway-co-v-united-states-cc-1953.