Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Ruckman

80 S.E. 496, 115 Va. 493, 1913 Va. LEXIS 60
CourtSupreme Court of Virginia
DecidedNovember 28, 1913
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 80 S.E. 496 (Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Ruckman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Ruckman, 80 S.E. 496, 115 Va. 493, 1913 Va. LEXIS 60 (Va. 1913).

Opinion

The following order wás entéred by the court:

Virginia :

Upon a writ of error and supersedeas to a judgment rendered by the Circuit Court of Augusta county on the 20th day of April, 1912.

This cause, which is pending in this court at its place of session at Staunton, having been fully heard, but not determined at said place of session, this day came here the parties, by counsel, and the court having maturely considered the transcript of record of the judgment aforesaid and arguments of counsel, is of opinion, for reasons stated in writing and filed with the record, that said judgment is erroneous and should be reversed upon the authority of Chicago and Alton Railroad Company against Kirby, 225 United States Reports 155, 32 Sup. Ct. 648.

It is therefore considered that the same be reversed and annulled, and that the plaintiff in error recover of the defendant in error its costs by it expended in the prosecution of its writ of error and supersedeas aforesaid here.

And this court, proceeding to enter such judgment as the said circuit court ought to have entered, is also of the [496]*496opinion that the law arising upon the demurrer of the defendant to the evidence of the plaintiff is for the defendant, that the said evidence is not sufficient to maintain the issue joined on the part of the plaintiff; therefore, it is further considered that the said demurrer be sustained, that the plaintiff take nothing by his bill, and that the defendant go thereof without day and recover against the plaintiff its costs by it about its defense in said circuit court expended.

Which is ordered to be entered in the order book here and forthwith certified, together with a certified copy of the opinion in this case, to the clerk of this court at Staunton, who will enter this order in the order book there and certify it to the said circuit court.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

L. J. Upton & Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
131 S.E. 827 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1926)
Eastern Shore v. New York
126 S.E. 674 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1925)
Parker v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
230 Ill. App. 259 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1923)
Norfolk-Southern Railroad v. Whitehurst
85 S.E. 458 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 S.E. 496, 115 Va. 493, 1913 Va. LEXIS 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chesapeake-ohio-railway-co-v-ruckman-va-1913.