Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Linstead

14 F.2d 1021, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2152
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedNovember 9, 1926
DocketNo. 4626
StatusPublished

This text of 14 F.2d 1021 (Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Linstead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Linstead, 14 F.2d 1021, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2152 (6th Cir. 1926).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are unable effectively to distinguish the facts of this ease from those of Hull v. Philadelphia, etc., Ry., 252 U. S. 475, 40 S. Ct. 358, 64 L. Ed. 670, an opinion which apparently was not brought to the attention of the trial court. It thus becomes necessary to reverse the judgment and remand for further proceedings. We express no opinion as to whether an amendment pursuant to the rule of the Kinney Case, 260 U. S. 340, 43 S. Ct. 122, 67 L. Ed. 294, can be allowed in the trial court, if now desired.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hull v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.
252 U.S. 475 (Supreme Court, 1920)
New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. Kinney
260 U.S. 340 (Supreme Court, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 F.2d 1021, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chesapeake-ohio-railway-co-v-linstead-ca6-1926.