Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Linstead
This text of 14 F.2d 1021 (Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Linstead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We are unable effectively to distinguish the facts of this ease from those of Hull v. Philadelphia, etc., Ry., 252 U. S. 475, 40 S. Ct. 358, 64 L. Ed. 670, an opinion which apparently was not brought to the attention of the trial court. It thus becomes necessary to reverse the judgment and remand for further proceedings. We express no opinion as to whether an amendment pursuant to the rule of the Kinney Case, 260 U. S. 340, 43 S. Ct. 122, 67 L. Ed. 294, can be allowed in the trial court, if now desired.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 F.2d 1021, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chesapeake-ohio-railway-co-v-linstead-ca6-1926.