Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Co. v. Bradley

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Co. v. Bradley

5 F. Cas. 562, 4 D.C. 193, 4 Cranch 193

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedDecember 15, 1831

StatusPublished

This text of 5 F. Cas. 562 (Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Co. v. Bradley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Co. v. Bradley, 5 F. Cas. 562, 4 D.C. 193, 4 Cranch 193 (circtddc 1831).

Pincite

Opinion

This was a motion for judgment for an instalment on a joint subscription by the defendants, in the handwriting of Mr. Bradley, for one hundred shares. The ten days’ notice, required by the fifth section of the charter, was served on Mr. Carroll on Sunday. Upon that ground the motion was overruled by the Court, although the parties had appeared according to the notice. Monkhouse v. Roberts, 8 East, 547; Rex v. Croke, Cowp. 26.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This was a motion for judgment for an instalment on a joint subscription by the defendants, in the handwriting of Mr. Bradley, for one hundred shares. The ten days’ notice, required by the fifth section of the charter, was served on Mr. Carroll on Sunday. Upon that ground the motion was overruled by the Court, although the parties had appeared according to the notice. Monkhouse v. Roberts, 8 East, 547; Rex v. Croke, Cowp. 26.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 F. Cas. 562, 4 D.C. 193, 4 Cranch 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chesapeake-ohio-canal-co-v-bradley-circtddc-1831.