Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Co. v. Barcroft
This text of 4 D.C. 659 (Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Co. v. Barcroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
(nem. cm.) quashed the execution in this case, because'the supersedeas judgment, upon which it was issued, was not confessed until after the expiration of two months after the original judgment. See the following cases heretofore decided by this Court, namely, Hodgson v. Mountz & Knowles, at December term, 1806, (1 Cranch, C. C. 366); Smith v. Middleton, April term, 1821, (2 Cranch, C. C. 233); Mandeville v. Love, October term, 1821, (Id. 249); McSherry v. Queen et al., April term, 1823, (Id. 406); Holmes v. Bussard, April term, 1823, (Id. 401); and Thomas v. Elliot, October term, 1823, (Id. 432.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 D.C. 659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chesapeake-ohio-canal-co-v-barcroft-circtddc-1835.