Chesapeake & O. Canal Co. v. Barcroft
This text of 5 F. Cas. 560 (Chesapeake & O. Canal Co. v. Barcroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
(nem. eon.) quashed the execution in' this case, because the supersedeas judgment, upon which it was issued, was hot confessed until after the expiration of Lwo months after the original judgment. See the following cases heretofore decided by this court, namely, Hodgson y. Mountz, at December term, 1806 [Case No. 6,509]; Smith v. Middleton, April term, 1821 [Id. 13,079]; Mandeville v. Love, October term, 1S21 [Id. 9,012]; McSherry v. Queen, April term, 1823 [Id. 8,926]; Holmes v. Bussard, April term, 1823 [Id. 6,630]; and Thomas v. Elliot, Octo-oer term, 1S23 [Id. 13,896].
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 F. Cas. 560, 4 Cranch 659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chesapeake-o-canal-co-v-barcroft-circtddc-1835.