Chesapeake House, Inc. v. Lee Mutual Insurance Agency, Inc.

239 So. 2d 602
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 11, 1970
DocketNo. 69-572
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 239 So. 2d 602 (Chesapeake House, Inc. v. Lee Mutual Insurance Agency, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chesapeake House, Inc. v. Lee Mutual Insurance Agency, Inc., 239 So. 2d 602 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

Opinion

MANN, Judge.

An insurance broker is not, as a matter of law, the insured’s agent for receipt of premium refund upon cancellation. Hermann v. Niagara Fire Ins. Co., 1885, 100 N.Y. 411, 3 N.E. 341. Whether the broker is agent as a matter of fact is not determined by the record on which summary judgment was entered. Agency, pleaded here, is yet to be determined. Miller v. Chase & Co., 1924, 88 Fla. 500, 102 So. 553. See 44 C.J.S. Insurance § 168; 44 Am.Jur.2d Insurance § 151 et seq.

Reversed and remanded.

HOBSON, C. J., and LILES, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McFarling v. Demco, Inc.
1976 OK 15 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1976)
Weeki Wachee Orchid Gardens v. FLORIDA INLAND TH.
239 So. 2d 602 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
239 So. 2d 602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chesapeake-house-inc-v-lee-mutual-insurance-agency-inc-fladistctapp-1970.