Chesapeake Climate Action Network v. Export-Import Bank of the United States
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 CHESAPEAKE CLIMATE, et al., 11 United States District Court
Plaintiffs, No. C 13-03532 WHA For the Northern District of California
12 v. 13 EXPORT IMPORT BANK, et al., NOTICE REGARDING 14 UPCOMING HEARING Defendants. 15 /
16 Your case is set for a motion hearing on NOVEMBER 14, 2013. 17 Please remember our need to train our next generation of lawyers. So please consider the 18 advisability of assigning the argument to a lawyer of less than four years experience out of law 19 school in your office. If you send a letter soon stating that such a lawyer will conduct the 20 argument (for at least one side), then the hearing will definitely go forward; otherwise, the Court 21 may rule in advance based on the papers if it concludes an oral argument would be of limited 22 value in resolving the motion, in which case the hearing would be vacated. If you intend to 23 submit such a letter, please do so by NOON ON OCTOBER 24, 2013, AT NOON. 24 25 26 Dated: October 21, 2013. 27 WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chesapeake Climate Action Network v. Export-Import Bank of the United States (Chesapeake Climate Action Network v. Export-Import Bank of the United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.