Chesapeake Beverage Co. v. Weese

Missouri Court of Appeals

Chesapeake Beverage Co. v. Weese

850 S.W.2d 124, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 511, 1993 WL 106300

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 13, 1993·No. No. 62257·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff’s petition on account and defendant’s counterclaim were heard by the trial court sitting without a jury. The trial court found in favor of plaintiff on its petition and also in favor of plaintiff on defendant’s counterclaim. Defendant appeals.

The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976). No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff’s petition on account and defendant’s counterclaim were heard by the trial court sitting without a jury. The trial court found in favor of plaintiff on its petition and also in favor of plaintiff on defendant’s counterclaim. Defendant appeals.

The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976). No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Chesapeake Beverage Co. v. Weese, 850 S.W.2d 124, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 511, 1993 WL 106300 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

850 S.W.2d 124 (Chesapeake Beverage Co. v. Weese) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related