Cheryle Taylor Wiggins v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 31, 2010
Docket02-09-00345-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Cheryle Taylor Wiggins v. State (Cheryle Taylor Wiggins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cheryle Taylor Wiggins v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

                                                COURT OF APPEALS

                                                 SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                                FORT WORTH

                                        NO. 2-09-345-CR

CHERYLE TAYLOR WIGGINS                                                 APPELLANT

                                                   V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS                                                                STATE

                                              ------------

           FROM THE 297TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

                                MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]


A jury convicted Appellant Cheryle Taylor Wiggins of felony driving while intoxicated and assessed her punishment at sixteen years= confinement and a $10,000 fine.  The trial court sentenced her accordingly.  In her sole point, Appellant contends that the trial court erred by ordering that she pay court costs and attorney=s fees as a condition of parole.  The trial court did not so order but merely Arecommend[ed] that any unpaid amounts be added as a condition of parole,@ which is permissible.[2]  [Emphasis added.]  We therefore overrule Appellant=s sole point and affirm the trial court=s judgment.

LEE ANN DAUPHINOT

JUSTICE

PANEL:  LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GABRIEL, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: August 31, 2010



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

[2]See Ceballos v. State, 246 S.W.3d 369, 373 (Tex. App.CAustin 2008, pet. ref=d) (noting that trial court has authority to recommend parole conditions and modifying judgment conditioning parole upon payment of court costs, fines, and attorney=s fees to instead recommend that parole board order payment); McNeill v. State, 991 S.W.2d 300, 302B03 (Tex. App.CHouston [1st Dist.] 1999, pet. ref=d, untimely filed) (upholding judgment that recommended payment of restitution as condition of parole).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ceballos v. State
246 S.W.3d 369 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2008)
McNeill v. State
991 S.W.2d 300 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Cheryle Taylor Wiggins v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cheryle-taylor-wiggins-v-state-texapp-2010.