Cheryl Hughes v. the Park at Lakeside

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 10, 2008
Docket14-08-00127-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Cheryl Hughes v. the Park at Lakeside (Cheryl Hughes v. the Park at Lakeside) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cheryl Hughes v. the Park at Lakeside, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 10, 2008

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 10, 2008.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-08-00127-CV

CHERYL HUGHES, Appellant

V.

THE PARK AT LAKESIDE, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No.910925

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N


This is an appeal from a judgment signed February 4, 2008.  The notice of appeal was filed February 13, 2008.  The clerk=s record was filed February 27, 2008.  To date, our records show that appellant has neither established indigence nor paid the $175.00 appellate filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent);Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007) (listing fees in court of appeals); Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 51.207 (Vernon 2005) (same).

After being given the requisite ten-days= notice that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant has not responded or paid the filing fee in accordance with our order of March 13, 2008See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.  Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time)

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed April 10, 2008.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Fowler and Boyce.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Cheryl Hughes v. the Park at Lakeside, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cheryl-hughes-v-the-park-at-lakeside-texapp-2008.