Cheryl H. v. Thomas G. L.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cheryl H. v. Thomas G. L.

224 A.D.2d 1025, 638 N.Y.S.2d 1025, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1712

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 2, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 224 A.D.2d 1025 (Cheryl H. v. Thomas G. L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cheryl H. v. Thomas G. L., 224 A.D.2d 1025, 638 N.Y.S.2d 1025, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1712 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: An order of filiation is not appealable as of right where support was sought in the paternity petition (Family Ct Act § 1112 [a]; Matter of Jane PP. v Paul QQ., 64 NY2d 15, 17; Matter of Cheryl A. B. v Michael Anthony D., 197 AD2d 851). In the exercise of our discretion, we deem the notice of appeal to be an application for leave to appeal, and we grant leave (see, Family Ct Act § 1112 [a]; Matter of Niagara County Dept. of Social Servs. [Kay B.] v Samuel M. [appeal No. 1] 222 AD2d 1071). (Appeal from Order of Monroe County Family Court, Houston, J.H.O. — Paternity.) Present— Denman, P. J., Green, Wesley, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: An order of filiation is not appealable as of right where support was sought in the paternity petition (Family Ct Act § 1112 [a]; Matter of Jane PP. v Paul QQ., 64 NY2d 15, 17; Matter of Cheryl A. B. v Michael Anthony D., 197 AD2d 851). In the exercise of our discretion, we deem the notice of appeal to be an application for leave to appeal, and we grant leave (see, Family Ct Act § 1112 [a]; Matter of Niagara County Dept. of Social Servs. [Kay B.] v Samuel M. [appeal No. 1] 222 AD2d 1071). (Appeal from Order of Monroe County Family Court, Houston, J.H.O. — Paternity.) Present— Denman, P. J., Green, Wesley, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

224 A.D.2d 1025, 638 N.Y.S.2d 1025, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cheryl-h-v-thomas-g-l-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack