Cheryl E. Hill v. Federal National Mortgage Association
This text of Cheryl E. Hill v. Federal National Mortgage Association (Cheryl E. Hill v. Federal National Mortgage Association) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER
Appellate case name: Cheryl E. Hill v. Federal National Mortgage Association
Appellate case number: 01-14-00359-CV
Trial court case number: 1044206
Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 4 of Harris County
On July 7, 2014, appellant, Cheryl E. Hill, filed a motion to “Obtain Review of Excessive Supersedes [sic] Bond” and an “Application for an Emergency TRO Order/Injunction Against Defendants.” The County Civil Court at Law No. 4 of Harris County signed the judgment against appellant on April 21, 2014. Accordingly, we DENY appellant’s motion and her application. See TEX. PROP. CODE ANN. § 24.007(a) (West Supp. 2013) (“A judgment of a county court in an eviction suit may not under any circumstances be stayed pending appeal unless, within 10 days of the signing of the judgment, the appellant files a supersedeas bond in an amount set by the county court.”). It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: /s/ Chief Justice Sherry Radack Acting individually Acting for the Court
Date: July 9, 2014
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cheryl E. Hill v. Federal National Mortgage Association, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cheryl-e-hill-v-federal-national-mortgage-associat-texapp-2014.