Cheryl Denton v. Ashland Oil, Inc.
This text of Cheryl Denton v. Ashland Oil, Inc. (Cheryl Denton v. Ashland Oil, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________
No. 98-4132 ___________
Cheryl Denton, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Ashland Oil, Inc., a Kentucky * District of Minnesota. corporation, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: July 7, 1999
Filed: ___________
Before HANSEN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. ___________
PER CURIAM.
Cheryl Denton appeals following the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment in favor of Ashland Oil, Inc., in Ms. Denton’s action to recover for personal injuries arising from her fall on the premises owned by SuperAmerica Group, a division of Ashland. After de novo review of the record and the parties’ submissions, see Do v.
1 The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. Wal-Mart Stores, 162 F.3d 1010, 1012 (8th Cir. 1998) (per curiam), we conclude the district court correctly granted summary judgment in Ashland’s favor. We also conclude a comprehensive opinion in this diversity case would lack precedential value. We thus affirm the district court’s ruling without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cheryl Denton v. Ashland Oil, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cheryl-denton-v-ashland-oil-inc-ca8-1999.