Cheryl B. v. Ronald B.

213 A.D.2d 1041, 625 N.Y.S.2d 763, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3844
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 17, 1995
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 213 A.D.2d 1041 (Cheryl B. v. Ronald B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cheryl B. v. Ronald B., 213 A.D.2d 1041, 625 N.Y.S.2d 763, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3844 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in ordering blood-grouping tests during the divorce action. The court’s finding that defendant did not formally raise the issue of paternity until after he was convinced that divorce was inevitable is supported by the record. Defendant initially raised the question of paternity with plaintiff when the child was IV2 years old. Under the circumstances, the court properly concluded that defendant was not equitably

[1042]*1042estopped from contesting the child’s paternity (cf., Matter of Kim Marie V. v Michael S., 195 AD2d 985). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Rosenbloom, J.— Paternity.) Present—Green, J. P., Wesley, Callahan, Doerr and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Willard D. D. v. Laurie A. D.
213 A.D.2d 1041 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
213 A.D.2d 1041, 625 N.Y.S.2d 763, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cheryl-b-v-ronald-b-nyappdiv-1995.