Cherubini v. State

114 So. 3d 315, 2013 WL 1982292, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7807
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 15, 2013·No. No. 2D12-3108·Published

Opinion

ALTENBERND, Judge.

We affirm without discussion Stuart Cherubim’s judgments and sentences for dealing in stolen property and for provid[316]*316ing false information on a pawnbroker form. For the reasons expressed in Williams v. State, 66 So.3d 360 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (recognizing conflict and certifying questions), review granted, Williams v. State, 70 So.3d 588 (Fla.2011), and its progeny, we certify conflict with Kiss v. State, 42 So.3d 810 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cherubini v. State, 114 So. 3d 315, 2013 WL 1982292, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7807 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

114 So. 3d 315 (Cherubini v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
66 So. 3d 360 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Kiss v. State
42 So. 3d 810 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)