Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Cherubini v. State

Cherubini v. State

114 So. 3d 315, 2013 WL 1982292, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7807
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 15, 2013
DocketNo. 2D12-3108
StatusPublished

This text of 114 So. 3d 315 (Cherubini v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cherubini v. State, 114 So. 3d 315, 2013 WL 1982292, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7807 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

ALTENBERND, Judge.

We affirm without discussion Stuart Cherubim’s judgments and sentences for dealing in stolen property and for provid[316]*316ing false information on a pawnbroker form. For the reasons expressed in Williams v. State, 66 So.3d 360 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (recognizing conflict and certifying questions), review granted, Williams v. State, 70 So.3d 588 (Fla.2011), and its progeny, we certify conflict with Kiss v. State, 42 So.3d 810 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. State
66 So. 3d 360 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Kiss v. State
42 So. 3d 810 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 So. 3d 315, 2013 WL 1982292, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cherubini-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.