Chertok v. Resnick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chertok v. Resnick

303 A.D.2d 499, 756 N.Y.S.2d 435, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2323

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 10, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 303 A.D.2d 499 (Chertok v. Resnick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chertok v. Resnick, 303 A.D.2d 499, 756 N.Y.S.2d 435, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2323 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent dated September 3, 2002, which, inter alia, adhered to a prior determination dated April 22, 2002, temporarily suspending the petitioner’s pistol license until the final disposition of certain charges then pending against the petitioner in the Town of Clarkstown Justice Court, and directed the petitioner to surrender his firearms and permit.

Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

On November 7, 2002, while this proceeding was pending, the criminal prosecution terminated with the petitioner’s conviction of driving while impaired. The petitioner acknowledges that this rendered academic his challenge to the determination dated September 3, 2002, and the interim suspension of his pistol permit. Goldstein, J.P., Adams, Townes and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent dated September 3, 2002, which, inter alia, adhered to a prior determination dated April 22, 2002, temporarily suspending the petitioner’s pistol license until the final disposition of certain charges then pending against the petitioner in the Town of Clarkstown Justice Court, and directed the petitioner to surrender his firearms and permit.

Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

On November 7, 2002, while this proceeding was pending, the criminal prosecution terminated with the petitioner’s conviction of driving while impaired. The petitioner acknowledges that this rendered academic his challenge to the determination dated September 3, 2002, and the interim suspension of his pistol permit. Goldstein, J.P., Adams, Townes and Crane, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

303 A.D.2d 499, 756 N.Y.S.2d 435, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chertok-v-resnick-nyappdiv-2003.