Cherry v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: November 18, 2010
• Docket: 09-2237
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2237

KELLY MONIQUE CHERRY; CHRISTOPHER INGRAM; JERMAINE PHILLIPE MACK; WINIFRED DEVON SWEENEY,

Plaintiffs – Appellants,

v.

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INCORPORATED, An Ohio Corporation,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:07-cv-00403-D)

Submitted: November 8, 2010 Decided: November 18, 2010

Before AGEE, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alvin L. Pittman, LAW OFFICES OF ALVIN L. PITTMAN, Los Angeles, California, for Appellants. Susan B. Molony, ALSTON & BIRD, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina; Matthew J. Gilligan, ALSTON & BIRD, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kelly Monique Cherry, Christopher Ingram, Jermaine

Phillipe Mack, and Winifred Devon Sweeney appeal the district

court’s order and judgment granting United Parcel Service,

Inc.’s summary judgment motions on their North Carolina state

law claims for defamation, malicious prosecution, false

imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and

willful or wanton conduct. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district

court’s judgment. See Cherry v. United Parcel Serv., Inc.,

No. 5:07-cv-00403-D (E.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 2009). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED