Cherry v. State
This text of 252 S.E.2d 180 (Cherry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant appeals his conviction of two counts of aggravated battery. Held:
1. Defense counsel asked defendant on direct examination,"... have you ever been convicted of a felony involving moral turpitude?” Defendant responded, "No, Sir.” No other evidence which would bear on defendant’s *656 character was adduced. A charge on good character is only required when direct examination relates to general reputation, good or bad. Wilson v. State, 190 Ga. 824 (10 SE2d 861). This solitary statement was insufficient to require a charge on good character, and the trial court did not err in refusing to honor defendant’s written request.
2. The evidence authorized the conviction.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
252 S.E.2d 180, 148 Ga. App. 655, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 1591, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cherry-v-state-gactapp-1979.