Cherry v. State

679 So. 2d 1256, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9788, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2083
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cherry v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 718 So. 2d 294
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 18, 1996·No. No. 95-02435·Published

Opinion

SCHEB, JOHN M., Senior Judge.

The state charged the appellant with the offense of robbery with a firearm, allegedly occurring on August 7, 1993. The appellant entered a plea of no contest to the lesser charge of robbery. He was sentenced to five years’ incarceration followed by five years’ probation, consecutive to a sentence imposed in another county. Because this is an An-ders appeal, the appellant was given the opportunity to file a pro se brief and he did so. After careful consideration of the issue raised by the appellant pro se, we find that issue to be without merit.

However, we recognize that the trial court erred in imposing a $2 cost pursuant to section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes (1993), [1257]*1257because imposition of that cost was not announced at sentencing. Accordingly, we strike the $2 cost item. In all other respects, we affirm.

Affirmed; $2 cost stricken.

PATTERSON, A.C.J., and WHATLEY, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cherry v. State, 679 So. 2d 1256, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9788, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2083 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

679 So. 2d 1256 (Cherry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.