Cherry v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance
2 A.2d 515, 133 Pa. Super. 180, 1938 Pa. Super. LEXIS 292
Opinion
The six judges who heard the argument in this case being equally divided in opinion, the judgment is affirmed. 1
1
A judgment by an equally divided court is a decision, but not a precedent: Griel’s Est., 171 Pa. 412, 416, 417, 33 A. 375; Com. v. Reid, 265 Pa. 328, 335, 108 A. 829; Etting v. Bank of United States, 11 Wheaton 59, 78.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cherry v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance, 2 A.2d 515, 133 Pa. Super. 180, 1938 Pa. Super. LEXIS 292 (Pa. Ct. App. 1938).
2 A.2d 515 (Cherry v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Harvie
148 Pa. Super. 607 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1942)
Commonwealth v. Heller
64 A.2d 460 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1941)