Home/Superior Court of Pennsylvania/Cherry v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance

Cherry v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance

2 A.2d 515, 133 Pa. Super. 180, 1938 Pa. Super. LEXIS 292
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 25, 1938
DocketAppeal, 165
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 2 A.2d 515 (Cherry v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cherry v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance, 2 A.2d 515, 133 Pa. Super. 180, 1938 Pa. Super. LEXIS 292 (Pa. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The six judges who heard the argument in this case being equally divided in opinion, the judgment is affirmed. 1

1

A judgment by an equally divided court is a decision, but not a precedent: Griel’s Est., 171 Pa. 412, 416, 417, 33 A. 375; Com. v. Reid, 265 Pa. 328, 335, 108 A. 829; Etting v. Bank of United States, 11 Wheaton 59, 78.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Harvie
148 Pa. Super. 607 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1942)
Commonwealth v. Heller
64 A.2d 460 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 A.2d 515, 133 Pa. Super. 180, 1938 Pa. Super. LEXIS 292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cherry-v-massachusetts-bonding-insurance-pasuperct-1938.