Cherry v. Home Building & Loan Ass'n

55 Ga. 19
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 15, 1875·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Bleckley, Judge.

If the decision, foreshadowed by the court, had been one in denial of the motion, perhaps it would have been too late to withdraw; but we do not see why a victory may not be declined in the very moment of success. Men do not always know what to pray for; and when they see that an ill-chosen petition is about to be granted, to be obliged to persevere in it and accept the boon, whether they will or not, would be a strict rule of practice. It would seem that they ought to be allowed to drop their suit and quit the court — taxed only with the costs. Judgment on the motion was still in the future; it was not actually rendered; the judge simply announced, orally, that he should order the rule absolute opened; he passed no order. The case is not like that of a verdict made up and signed: 7 Georgia, 191; 34 Ibid., 572; 48 Ibid., 592. It may be, too, that even a verdict, wholly in the plaintiff’s favor for all his demand, would be no bar to a dismissal of the suit until after entry on the minutes, or perhaps until after the signing of judgment thereon: Code, section 3447.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cherry v. Home Building & Loan Ass'n, 55 Ga. 19 (Ga. 1875).

55 Ga. 19 (Cherry v. Home Building & Loan Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mahone v. Sherman
370 S.E.2d 806 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1988)
Cooper v. Rosser
211 S.E.2d 303 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1974)
Cowart v. Atlanta, Birmingham & Coast Railway Co.
198 S.E. 795 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
Peoples Bank v. Exchange Bank
46 S.E. 416 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)