Cherry v. Hofstra University

274 A.D.2d 443, 711 N.Y.S.2d 898, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7857
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 17, 2000·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Davis, J.), dated November 3, 1999, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff was injured during lacrosse practice when he ran into a bench which was located on the side of the defendant’s playing field. The Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The bench was an open and obvious condition which could “readily be observed by those employing the reasonable use of their senses” (Paulo v Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., 233 AD2d 380). In opposition to the defendant’s establishment of a prima facie case, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Bracken, J. P., Joy, Thompson and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cherry v. Hofstra University, 274 A.D.2d 443, 711 N.Y.S.2d 898, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7857 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

274 A.D.2d 443 (Cherry v. Hofstra University) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Krzenski v. Southampton Union Free Sch. Dist.
2019 NY Slip Op 4370 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Erario v. Wen Shirley, LLC
2019 NY Slip Op 1059 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Genefar v. Great Neck Park District
2017 NY Slip Op 8812 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Willis v. Barnes and Noble, Inc.
15 Misc. 3d 27 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Simmons v. Sam's East, Inc.
293 A.D.2d 596 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)