Cherry v. Edwards
This text of 155 F. App'x 529 (Cherry v. Edwards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUMMARY ORDER
ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and hereby is AFFIRMED.
Plaintiff-appellant Thomas Robinson, pro se, appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Maas, M.J.) entered pursuant to an unreported Decision and Order dated January 18, 2005, granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment and denying Robinson’s cross motion to amend the complaint. The parties’ familiarity with the facts is assumed. For the reasons stated in the District Court’s thorough opinion, we affirm.
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
155 F. App'x 529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cherry-v-edwards-ca2-2005.