Cherry Township v. Sullivan County

30 Pa. Super. 502, 1906 Pa. Super. LEXIS 108
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 23, 1906
DocketAppeal, No. 7
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 30 Pa. Super. 502 (Cherry Township v. Sullivan County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cherry Township v. Sullivan County, 30 Pa. Super. 502, 1906 Pa. Super. LEXIS 108 (Pa. Ct. App. 1906).

Opinion

Pee Cueiam,

The defendant demurred to the plaintiff’s statement of claim ; after hearing the court held that the statement was defective in a certain particular, and to dihat extent sustained the demurrer, “ with leave, however, to the plaintiff to amend the statement in this respect,” and in all other respects overruled the demurrer. Thereupon the plaintiff filed an amended statement curing the defect pointed out in the opinion of the court. The defendant then took this appeal. The plaintiff moves to quash upon the ground, amongst others, that the order of the court is not a final judgment, and therefore the appeal is premature. The cases, cited in the appellee’s brief, and many others that might be cited, show conclusively that the motion must prevail.

The appeal is quashed at the appellant’s cost, and the record remitted with a procedendo.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marnet Hosiery Mill, Inc. v. Greco
90 A.2d 381 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 Pa. Super. 502, 1906 Pa. Super. LEXIS 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cherry-township-v-sullivan-county-pasuperct-1906.