Cherry Co. v. United States

52 Cust. Ct. 529, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1326
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedApril 28, 1964
DocketReap. Dec. 10728; Entry No. 3216, etc.
StatusPublished

This text of 52 Cust. Ct. 529 (Cherry Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cherry Co. v. United States, 52 Cust. Ct. 529, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1326 (cusc 1964).

Opinion

OliveR, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows:
1. That this stipulation is limited to the items marked “A” and initialed RS (Examiner’s Initials) by Examiner Ronald Sakamoto (Examiner’s Name) on the invoices covered by the appeals for reappraisement enumerated on Schedule “A” annexed, and is abandoned as to all other merchandise.
2. That the merchandise was imported prior to the effective date of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (T.D. 54521).
3. That the merchandise consists of canned clams of the type made dutiable upon the basis of the American selling price of a like or similar domestic article, as such American selling price is defined in Section 402(g), Tariff Act of 1930 as it existed prior to said Customs Simplification Act, by the operation of Presidential Proclamation 2081, T.D. 47031.
4. That the merchandise and the issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in Geo. 8. Bush & Go., Inc., v. United, States, A.R.D. 140, and that the record in the cited case may be incorporated herein.
5. That the merchandise herein consists of packs of 10% ounce tins and that on or about the date of exportation, the American selling price of a “like” domestic clam, as defined in said Section 402(g), was $7.50 per two dozen tins, less 1% per centum cash discount, less one-tenth of 1 per centum swell allowance, net packed.
6. The appeals listed on said Schedule “A” may be submitted on this stipulation, the same being limited to the merchandise and the issues described herein-above and abandoned in all other respects.

On the agreed facts and consistent with the cited decision on the law, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the canned clams [530]*530in question, as hereinabove identified, is American selling price, as defined in section 402(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and hold that such statutory value therefor is $7.50 per 2 dozen tins, less I14 per centum cash discount, less one-tenth of 1 per centum swell allowance, net, packed.

As to all merchandise, other than the canned clams hereinabove identified, the said appeals for reappraisement are dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 Cust. Ct. 529, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cherry-co-v-united-states-cusc-1964.