Cherpock v. Carlo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cherpock v. Carlo

243 A.D.2d 532, 663 N.Y.S.2d 998, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9803

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 14, 1997·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff Lorraine Cherpock appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DeMaro, J.), dated September 13, 1996, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the defendants’ counterclaim.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

It is undisputed that the subject accident occurred when the front end of a car operated by the defendant Jennifer Carlo collided with the rear end of a car operated by the plaintiff Lorraine Cherpock. The record presents triable issues of fact as to the cause of that collision. Miller, J. P., Ritter, Sullivan, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff Lorraine Cherpock appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DeMaro, J.), dated September 13, 1996, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the defendants’ counterclaim.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

It is undisputed that the subject accident occurred when the front end of a car operated by the defendant Jennifer Carlo collided with the rear end of a car operated by the plaintiff Lorraine Cherpock. The record presents triable issues of fact as to the cause of that collision. Miller, J. P., Ritter, Sullivan, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cherpock v. Carlo, 243 A.D.2d 532, 663 N.Y.S.2d 998, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9803 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

243 A.D.2d 532 (Cherpock v. Carlo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related