Cherpock v. Carlo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cherpock v. Carlo

243 A.D.2d 532, 663 N.Y.S.2d 998, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9803

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 14, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 243 A.D.2d 532 (Cherpock v. Carlo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cherpock v. Carlo, 243 A.D.2d 532, 663 N.Y.S.2d 998, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9803 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff Lorraine Cherpock appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DeMaro, J.), dated September 13, 1996, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the defendants’ counterclaim.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

It is undisputed that the subject accident occurred when the front end of a car operated by the defendant Jennifer Carlo collided with the rear end of a car operated by the plaintiff Lorraine Cherpock. The record presents triable issues of fact as to the cause of that collision. Miller, J. P., Ritter, Sullivan, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff Lorraine Cherpock appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DeMaro, J.), dated September 13, 1996, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the defendants’ counterclaim.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

It is undisputed that the subject accident occurred when the front end of a car operated by the defendant Jennifer Carlo collided with the rear end of a car operated by the plaintiff Lorraine Cherpock. The record presents triable issues of fact as to the cause of that collision. Miller, J. P., Ritter, Sullivan, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 A.D.2d 532, 663 N.Y.S.2d 998, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cherpock-v-carlo-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack