Cherpin v. Tillotson

6 Ala. 638
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 15, 1844
StatusPublished

This text of 6 Ala. 638 (Cherpin v. Tillotson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cherpin v. Tillotson, 6 Ala. 638 (Ala. 1844).

Opinion

GOLDTHWAITE, J.

Until the transcript is filed by the plaintiff in error, and errors assigned by him, the defendant has no other rights in this court than to have the judgment affirmed, upon the production of the proper certificate or citation; or for the omission to assign error.

By the statute prescribing the manner in which writs of error shall be sued out and prosecuted, it is made the duty of the clerk to deliver a transcript of the record to the party applying for the writ of error, or his attorney, to be, by him, returned to the first day of the next supreme court. It also provides, that if the record be not filed, or that, if filed, no errors be assigned within the [639]*639three first days of the term that an affirmance may be had by the defendant in error. [Clay’s Dig. 308, § 13.]

In Thacker v. Myrick, [3 Stewart, 184,] it was held that the defendant in error could not file the transcript, and move for an affirmance for the want "of an assignment of error. Since that decision, the practice then established does not appear to have been controverted.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thacker v. Myrick
3 Stew. 184 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1830)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Ala. 638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cherpin-v-tillotson-ala-1844.