Cheron v. LSC Corrections Services, Inc.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Cheron v. LSC Corrections Services, Inc.

828 So. 2d 1117, 2002 La. LEXIS 3349, 2002 WL 31520209

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedNovember 8, 2002

DocketNo. 2002-CC-2146

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 828 So. 2d 1117 (Cheron v. LSC Corrections Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cheron v. LSC Corrections Services, Inc., 828 So. 2d 1117, 2002 La. LEXIS 3349, 2002 WL 31520209 (La. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Louisiana State of; Public Safety & Corrections Dept, of; — Defendant(s); [1118]*1118Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. H, No. 486,044; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2002 CW 1049.

Granted. Based on the transcript, it appears the trial court and the parties contemplated that a written judgment would be signed, making the April 15, 2002 judgment the “ruling at issue” for purposes of Rule 4-8. Kosmitis v. Bailey, 96-1573 (La.10/4/96), 680 So.2d 1167. Accordingly, the ruling of the court of appeal is set aside, and the case remanded to the court of appeal to rule on the merits of the application.

KIMBALL, J., would deny the application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Louisiana State of; Public Safety & Corrections Dept, of; — Defendant(s); [1118]*1118Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. H, No. 486,044; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2002 CW 1049.

Granted. Based on the transcript, it appears the trial court and the parties contemplated that a written judgment would be signed, making the April 15, 2002 judgment the “ruling at issue” for purposes of Rule 4-8. Kosmitis v. Bailey, 96-1573 (La.10/4/96), 680 So.2d 1167. Accordingly, the ruling of the court of appeal is set aside, and the case remanded to the court of appeal to rule on the merits of the application.

KIMBALL, J., would deny the application.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

828 So. 2d 1117, 2002 La. LEXIS 3349, 2002 WL 31520209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cheron-v-lsc-corrections-services-inc-la-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack