Cherokeita Ruben Ina v. Harrick Laneal Murray

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 14, 2013·No. 01-12-00610-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued February 14, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-12-00610-CV ——————————— CHEROKEITA RUBEN INA, Appellant V. HARRICK LANEAL MURRAY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 245th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 9956661

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Cherokeita Ruben Ina, has neither paid the required filing fee for

this appeal nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 5 (“A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs

must pay—at the time an item is presented for filing—whatever fees are required by statute or Supreme Court order.”), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing

indigence); see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207 (West Supp. 2012),

§.51.941(a) (West 2005), § 101.041 (West Supp. 2012) (listing fees in court of

appeals); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and

the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation,

Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app.

A § B(1) (listing fees in court of appeals). The filing fee was due on July 16, 2012.

After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not

respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(b), (c)

(allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending

motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Massengale.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cherokeita Ruben Ina v. Harrick Laneal Murray, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Cherokeita Ruben Ina v. Harrick Laneal Murray (Cherokeita Ruben Ina v. Harrick Laneal Murray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.