Cherokee Sawmill Co. v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway

91 S.E. 790, 19 Ga. App. 475, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 169
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 15, 1917
Docket7741
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 91 S.E. 790 (Cherokee Sawmill Co. v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cherokee Sawmill Co. v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway, 91 S.E. 790, 19 Ga. App. 475, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 169 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Broyles, P. J.

1. A stipulation in a bill of lading issued by a common carrier, that the carrier can not be held liable for any injuries inflicted upon live stock transported by it, unless suit therefor is brought within six months aftér the right of action accrues, is not unreasonable, and is valid and binding. Missouri, Kansas & Texas R. Co. v. Harriman, 227 U. S. 657, 673 (33 Sup. Ct. 397, 57 L. ed. 690, 698); Maxwell v. Liverpool Ins. Co., 12 Ga. App. 127 (76 S. E. 1036).

2. Such a stipulation as is mentioned above takes the place of the statute of limitations and is governed by the same rules; and where fraud is relied upon to prevent the bar of the statute or the superseding stipulation from attaching, it must be such fraud as involves moral turpitude. Austin v. Raiford, 68 Ga. 201; Maxwell v. Walsh, 117 Ga. 467, [476]*476471 (43 S. E. 704). In the instant case no such fraud was alleged in the plaintiff’s petition, nor were any facts therein shown which disclosed actual fraud of any kind.

Decided March 15, 1917. Action for damages; from city court of Floyd county—Judge Nunnally. July 19, 1916. Soscos Luke, Eubanks & Mebane, for plaintiff. Tye, Peeples & Tye, Dean & Dean, L. H. Covington, for defendant.

3. Under these rulings the court did not err in dismissing the plaintiff’s petition on general demurrer.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenhvns and Bloodworth, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kilpatrick v. Aetna Insurance Company
125 S.E.2d 791 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
Gibraltar Fire & Marine Insurance v. Lanier
13 S.E.2d 27 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
Golden Live Stock Co. v. Hines
107 S.E. 361 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Southern Express Co. v. Oliver
93 S.E. 109 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 S.E. 790, 19 Ga. App. 475, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cherokee-sawmill-co-v-nashville-chattanooga-st-louis-railway-gactapp-1917.