Chero-Cola Bottling Co. v. Southern Express Co.
This text of 116 S.E. 325 (Chero-Cola Bottling Co. v. Southern Express Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case was before this court on a previous occasion. Southern Express Co. v. Chero-Cola Bottling Co., 24 Ga. App. 190 (100 S. E. 289). The letter referred to in the headnotes was then held to have been improperly admitted in evidence over the objections: its subject-matter not shown, nor authority of R. H. May, nor who May was; hearsay. It appears, from the brief of the evidence, that upon the trial now under review there was proof sufficient to meet the objections and to render it admissible. However, it comes before us now unobjected to. The record discloses that objections were made, but no cross-bill of exceptions was filed to preserve them.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
116 S.E. 325, 29 Ga. App. 656, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chero-cola-bottling-co-v-southern-express-co-gactapp-1923.