Chernuchin v. Kalmanoff

249 A.D. 774, 292 N.Y.S. 71, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5959

This text of 249 A.D. 774 (Chernuchin v. Kalmanoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chernuchin v. Kalmanoff, 249 A.D. 774, 292 N.Y.S. 71, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5959 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for alleged fraudulent representations, judgment in favor of the defendants, entered upon the dismissal of the complaint as to defendant Kalmanoff at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence, and upon the direction of a verdict for defendant Landes at the close of all the evidence in the case, reversed upon the law and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. In our opinion, the evidence given upon the trial of this ease presented a question of fact which should have been submitted to the jury. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Davis and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
249 A.D. 774, 292 N.Y.S. 71, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5959, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chernuchin-v-kalmanoff-nyappdiv-1936.