Chernuchin v. Kalmanoff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chernuchin v. Kalmanoff

249 A.D. 774, 292 N.Y.S. 71, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5959

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 28, 1936·Published

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for alleged fraudulent representations, judgment in favor of the defendants, entered upon the dismissal of the complaint as to defendant Kalmanoff at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence, and upon the direction of a verdict for defendant Landes at the close of all the evidence in the case, reversed upon the law and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. In our opinion, the evidence given upon the trial of this ease presented a question of fact which should have been submitted to the jury. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Davis and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for alleged fraudulent representations, judgment in favor of the defendants, entered upon the dismissal of the complaint as to defendant Kalmanoff at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence, and upon the direction of a verdict for defendant Landes at the close of all the evidence in the case, reversed upon the law and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. In our opinion, the evidence given upon the trial of this ease presented a question of fact which should have been submitted to the jury. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Davis and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Chernuchin v. Kalmanoff, 249 A.D. 774, 292 N.Y.S. 71, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5959 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

249 A.D. 774 (Chernuchin v. Kalmanoff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.