Chernow v. Feldman
This text of 269 A.D. 670 (Chernow v. Feldman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for leave to serve a second amended complaint on respondent Weinstein and granting the cross motion of the latter to dismiss the complaint for lack of prosecution. Order modified on the law by limiting the dismissal to Weinstein, the moving respondent, and as so modified the order is unanimously affirmed, without costs. (Paulson v. New Jersey & N. Y. R. R. Co., 54 App. Div. 189.) Appeal from judgment dismissed, without costs. There is no judgment printed in the record. Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
269 A.D. 670, 53 N.Y.S.2d 526, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chernow-v-feldman-nyappdiv-1945.