Chernow v. Feldman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chernow v. Feldman

269 A.D. 670, 53 N.Y.S.2d 526, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3184

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 19, 1945·Published

Opinion

Plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for leave to serve a second amended complaint on respondent Weinstein and granting the cross motion of the latter to dismiss the complaint for lack of prosecution. Order modified on the law by limiting the dismissal to Weinstein, the moving respondent, and as so modified the order is unanimously affirmed, without costs. (Paulson v. New Jersey & N. Y. R. R. Co., 54 App. Div. 189.) Appeal from judgment dismissed, without costs. There is no judgment printed in the record. Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for leave to serve a second amended complaint on respondent Weinstein and granting the cross motion of the latter to dismiss the complaint for lack of prosecution. Order modified on the law by limiting the dismissal to Weinstein, the moving respondent, and as so modified the order is unanimously affirmed, without costs. (Paulson v. New Jersey & N. Y. R. R. Co., 54 App. Div. 189.) Appeal from judgment dismissed, without costs. There is no judgment printed in the record. Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ.

Chernow v. Feldman, 269 A.D. 670, 53 N.Y.S.2d 526, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3184 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

Pincite

269 A.D. 670 (Chernow v. Feldman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related