Chernin v. Geauga Park Dist.

2018 Ohio 1717
CourtOhio Court of Claims
DecidedApril 17, 2018
Docket2017-00922PQ
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2018 Ohio 1717 (Chernin v. Geauga Park Dist.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chernin v. Geauga Park Dist., 2018 Ohio 1717 (Ohio Super. Ct. 2018).

Opinion

[Cite as Chernin v. Geauga Park Dist., 2018-Ohio-1717.]

SHELLEY K. CHERNIN Case No. 2017-00922PQ

Requester Judge Patrick M. McGrath

v. ENTRY ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF GEAUGA PARK DISTRICT SPECIAL MASTER

Respondent

{¶1} On August 14, 2017, requester Shelley Chernin made a public records request to respondent Geauga Park District for a copy of a constituent letter used by Park District board member Andrej Lah during a board meeting. (Complaint at 3.) On August 28, 2017, Park District Executive Director John Oros responded that “the letter is not considered to be a public record.” (Id. at 5.) On November 17, 2017, Chernin filed a complaint under R.C. 2743.75 alleging denial of timely access to public records in violation of R.C. 149.43(B). Following unsuccessful mediation, the Park District filed a motion to dismiss, and filed an unredacted copy of the requested letters under seal. On March 26, 2018, Special Master Clark issued a report finding that the constituent letters constituted records of the Geauga Park District, and recommending that the court issue an order GRANTING Chernin’s claim for production of the requested records. {¶2} R.C. 2743.75(F)(2) states, in part: “Either party may object to the report and recommendation within seven business days after receiving the report and recommendation by filing a written objection with the clerk * * *.” No objections were filed by either party. The court determines that there is no error of law or other defect evident on the face of the Special Master’s decision. Therefore, the court adopts the Special Master’s report and recommendation as its own, including findings of fact and conclusions of law contained therein. {¶3} Court costs are assessed against the respondent, and respondent is further ordered to make payment of twenty-five dollars to requester as recovery of her filing fee Case No. 2017-00922PQ -2- ENTRY

in this case. On provision of invoices or other sufficient evidence, Chernin is further entitled to recover from the Geauga Park District any other costs associated with the action that were incurred by her. R.C. 2743.75(F)(3)(b). The clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal.

PATRICK M. McGRATH Judge

Filed April 17, 2018 Sent to S.C. Reporter 5/4/18

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ferrise v. Berea City School Dist.
2024 Ohio 5310 (Ohio Court of Claims, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 Ohio 1717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chernin-v-geauga-park-dist-ohioctcl-2018.