Chernick v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

9 A.D.2d 700, 191 N.Y.S.2d 920, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6898
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Chernick v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 8 A.D.2d 264

Opinion

Motion for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals on a certified question. Motion granted, without costs, and this court certifies the following question: Is the exelusory language of section 1448 of the Civil Practice Act with reference to an infant applicable to the arbitration provision of the uninsured automobile coverage indorsement? Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chernick v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 9 A.D.2d 700, 191 N.Y.S.2d 920, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6898 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

9 A.D.2d 700 (Chernick v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.