Cherney v. NORTH CAROLINA ZOOLOGICAL PARK
This text of 633 S.E.2d 677 (Cherney v. NORTH CAROLINA ZOOLOGICAL PARK) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tinya CHERNEY
v.
NORTH CAROLINA ZOOLOGICAL PARK.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Michael W. Clark, Joe Thomas Knott, III, Raleigh, for Tinya Cherney.
William H. Borden, Assistant Attorney General, for N.C. Zoological Park.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 8th day of May 2006 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the NC Industrial Commission:
"Allowed by order of the Court in Conference this the 29th day of June 2006."
Justices NEWBY and TIMMONS-GOODSON recused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
633 S.E.2d 677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cherney-v-north-carolina-zoological-park-nc-2006.