Cheny v. Shelbyville

Indiana Supreme Court

Cheny v. Shelbyville

19 Ind. 84

Indiana Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1862·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

According to the cases of Bogart v. New Albany, 1 Ind. 38, and Webb v. Thorpe, 12 Id. 451, we have no jurisdiction of this case; but if we have, the case of The City of Lawrenceburg v. Wuest, shows that we must affirm the judgment rendered in it below.

Pay and Davis, for the appellant. Thomas A. Hendricks and P. M. Oreen, for the appellee.

A city may impose a liquor license, but it must be reasonable in amount.

The appeal is dismissed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

According to the cases of Bogart v. New Albany, 1 Ind. 38, and Webb v. Thorpe, 12 Id. 451, we have no jurisdiction of this case; but if we have, the case of The City of Lawrenceburg v. Wuest, shows that we must affirm the judgment rendered in it below.

Pay and Davis, for the appellant. Thomas A. Hendricks and P. M. Oreen, for the appellee.

A city may impose a liquor license, but it must be reasonable in amount.

The appeal is dismissed, with costs.

Cheny v. Shelbyville, 19 Ind. 84 (Ind. 1862).

Pincite

19 Ind. 84 (Cheny v. Shelbyville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related