Chengdu Emily, LLC v. Reilly

• Court: Nevada Supreme Court
• Decided: June 30, 2015
• Docket: 64821
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

Chengdu Emily alternatively argues NAR 8(B) and NAR 19(B) are unconstitutional because this court has "appellate jurisdiction in all civil cases arising in district courts." Nev. Const. art. 6, § 4(1). Because "we may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule," this argument is unavailing. Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev., Adv. Op. 37, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013). Last, Chengdu Emily asks this court to treat this appeal as a petition for extraordinary writ relief. Given the clarity of NAR 8(B) and NAR 19(B), we decline to do so. Cf. Clark Cnty. Liquor & Gaming Licensing Bd. v. Clark, 102 Nev. 654, 658, 730 P.2d 443, 446 (1986). Accordingly, we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED without prejudice to Chengdu Emily's ability to file a petition for extraordinary writ relief.

6/44 J. Parraguirre

Lea J. Douglas

i \i2A Che:y:

cc: Hon. Ronald J. Israel, District Judge Nathaniel J. Reed, Settlement Judge Wetherall Group, LTD. David J. Winterton & Associates, Ltd. Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1.947A 4094