Cheng v. United States
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SHENG-WEN CHENG, Plaintiff, 1:24-CV-5579 (ER) -against- ORDER OF SERVICE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. EDGARDO RAMOS, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Sheng-Wen Cheng, who is currently incarcerated as a federal prisoner in the Federal Medical Center in Rochester, Minnesota, brings this action pro se, asserting claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act, and seeking damages and declaratory relief. He sues the United States of America. By order dated July 24, 2024, the Court granted Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), that is, without prepayment of fees.1 The Court directs service on the United States of America. DISCUSSION Because Plaintiff has been granted permission to proceed IFP, he is entitled to rely on assistance from the Court and the United States Marshals Service (“USMS”) to effect service.2 Walker v. Schult, 717 F.3d 119, 123 n.6 (2d Cir. 2013); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (“The
1 Prisoners are not exempt from paying the full filing fee even when they have been granted permission to proceed IFP. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). 2 Although Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure generally requires that a summons be served within 90 days of the date the complaint is filed, Plaintiff is proceeding IFP and could not have effected service until the Court reviewed the complaint and ordered that any summonses be issued. The Court therefore extends the time to serve until 90 days after the date any summonses issue. officers of the court shall issue and serve all process . . . in [IFP] cases.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) (the court must order the USMS to serve if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed IFP). To allow Plaintiff to effect service on the United States of America through the USMS, the Clerk of Court is instructed to fill out a USMS Receipt and Return form (“USM-285 form”)
for the United States of America. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to issue a summons for the United States of America and deliver to the USMS all the paperwork necessary for the USMS to effect service on the United States of America. If the complaint is not served within 90 days after the date the summons is issued, Plaintiff should request an extension of time for service. See Meilleur v. Strong, 682 F.3d 56, 63 (2d Cir. 2012) (holding that it is the plaintiff’s responsibility to request an extension of time for service). Plaintiff must notify the Court in writing if his address changes, and the Court may dismiss the action if Plaintiff fails to do so. CONCLUSION The Court directs the Clerk of Court to mail an information package to Plaintiff.
The Court also directs service on the United States of America. The Court further directs the Clerk of Court to: (1) issue a summons for the United States of America; (2) complete a USM-285 form with the service addresses for the United States of America; (3) mark the box on the USM-285 form labeled “Check for service on U.S.A.”; and (4) deliver all documents necessary to effect service of the summons and the complaint on the United States of America to the USMS. SO ORDERED. Dated: August 28, 2024 . , New York, New York et \ EDGARDO RAMOS United States District Judge
SERVICE ADDRESSES
Attorney General of the United States United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20530 United States Attorney Southern District of New York Civil Division 86 Chambers Street, 3rd Floor New York, New York 10007
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cheng v. United States (Cheng v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.