Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Cheng v. State

Cheng v. State

595 So. 2d 1098, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3829, 1992 WL 55235
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 25, 1992
DocketNo. 91-0226
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 595 So. 2d 1098 (Cheng v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cheng v. State, 595 So. 2d 1098, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3829, 1992 WL 55235 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Considering the issues before us in the light of the fact that none were preserved below, see Trushin v. State, 425 So.2d 1126 (Fla.1982), we conclude that section 784.-045(l)(b), Florida Statutes (1989), which provides that simple battery upon a pregnant woman is aggravated battery, is not facially invalid, see State v. Nelson, 577 So.2d 971 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) (upholding section 784.08(2), which so provides as to persons over 65), and that fundamental error does not otherwise appear.

AFFIRMED.

LETTS, WARNER, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hahn v. Hahn
595 So. 2d 1098 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
595 So. 2d 1098, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3829, 1992 WL 55235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cheng-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.