Cheney v. National City Bank
This text of 63 S.E.2d 360 (Cheney v. National City Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition of the successor trustee alleges various reasons why it is to the interest of the trust estate that it have all powers conferred by item 4 of the will upon the original trustee, and prays that the will be construed to vest it with such powers. The answers of all the legatees admit the allegations of the petition, and pray that the court construe the will and make certain the powers of the successor trustee, and if the court entertains doubt that the petitioner succeeds to all the powers of the original trustee, that it so declare. The court construed the will to confer all powers of the original trustee upon the petitioner, and the defendants except. Held'.
All parties got what they prayed for, and the judgment is binding upon all of them; therefore, no party appears to be injured and, hence, the defendants have no right to except. Accordingly, the bill of exceptions is dismissed. First Nat. Bank of Borne v. Yancey, 207 Ga. 437 (62 S. E. 2d, 179).
Writ oj error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 S.E.2d 360, 207 Ga. 584, 1951 Ga. LEXIS 458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cheney-v-national-city-bank-ga-1951.