Chenault v. Yates

149 S.W. 1024, 149 Ky. 816, 1912 Ky. LEXIS 717
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Chenault v. Yates. Read the opinion of the Court — 156 Ky. 280
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided October 11, 1912·Published

Opinion

[817]*817Opinion op the Court by

Chief Justice Hobson

Sustaining motion to set aside submission.

Tbe appellant, T. J. Chenault, having died in July, 1912, before submission, the proceeding then abated and the subsequent submission without revivor on September 20, 1912, was irregular and must on motion of appellees be set aside. Deppe v. Immohr’s, 119 Ky., 421, and cases cited. A different rule applies on the death of a party after submission for the judgment then relates back to-the date of submission. What effect the proceedings had herein may have on appellees’ right to rely on matter of abatement after the revivor is had is a question not now presented.

Motion sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chenault v. Yates, 149 S.W. 1024, 149 Ky. 816, 1912 Ky. LEXIS 717 (Ky. Ct. App. 1912).

149 S.W. 1024 (Chenault v. Yates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Deppen v. Immohr's Ex'r
84 S.W. 333 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1905)