Chenault v. Yates

149 S.W. 1024, 149 Ky. 816, 1912 Ky. LEXIS 717
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedOctober 11, 1912
StatusPublished

This text of 149 S.W. 1024 (Chenault v. Yates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chenault v. Yates, 149 S.W. 1024, 149 Ky. 816, 1912 Ky. LEXIS 717 (Ky. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

[817]*817Opinion op the Court by

Chief Justice Hobson

Sustaining motion to set aside submission.

Tbe appellant, T. J. Chenault, having died in July, 1912, before submission, the proceeding then abated and the subsequent submission without revivor on September 20, 1912, was irregular and must on motion of appellees be set aside. Deppe v. Immohr’s, 119 Ky., 421, and cases cited. A different rule applies on the death of a party after submission for the judgment then relates back to-the date of submission. What effect the proceedings had herein may have on appellees’ right to rely on matter of abatement after the revivor is had is a question not now presented.

Motion sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Deppen v. Immohr's Ex'r
84 S.W. 333 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
149 S.W. 1024, 149 Ky. 816, 1912 Ky. LEXIS 717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chenault-v-yates-kyctapp-1912.