Chen v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore
This text of 546 F. App'x 187 (Chen v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[188]*188Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Bobby Chen appeals the district court’s order dismissing the complaint in this action for failure to effect service of process. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chen v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore, No. 1:1 1-cv-03227-GLR, 292 F.R.D. 288, 2013 WL 680597 (D.Md. Feb. 22, 2013). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel, grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
546 F. App'x 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chen-v-mayor-city-council-of-baltimore-ca4-2013.