Chen v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore

546 F. App'x 187
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 12, 2013·No. No. 13-1375·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

[188] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bobby Chen appeals the district court’s order dismissing the complaint in this action for failure to effect service of process. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chen v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore, No. 1:1 1-cv-03227-GLR, 292 F.R.D. 288, 2013 WL 680597 (D.Md. Feb. 22, 2013). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel, grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chen v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore, 546 F. App'x 187 (4th Cir. 2013).

546 F. App'x 187 (Chen v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related