Chen v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chen v. City of New York

54 A.D.3d 797, 863 N.Y.S.2d 373

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Chen v. City of New York. Read the opinion of the Court — 64 A.D.3d 542 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 16, 2008·Published

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Balter, J.), dated November 14, 2006, as, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendant City of New York and against her, dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against that defendant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The contentions raised by the plaintiff do not require reversal. Lifson, J.E, Florio, Garni and Belen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Balter, J.), dated November 14, 2006, as, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendant City of New York and against her, dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against that defendant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The contentions raised by the plaintiff do not require reversal. Lifson, J.E, Florio, Garni and Belen, JJ., concur.

Chen v. City of New York, 54 A.D.3d 797, 863 N.Y.S.2d 373 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

54 A.D.3d 797 (Chen v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.