ChemImage Corporation v. Johnson & Johnson

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedApril 26, 2024
Docket1:24-cv-02646
StatusUnknown

This text of ChemImage Corporation v. Johnson & Johnson (ChemImage Corporation v. Johnson & Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
ChemImage Corporation v. Johnson & Johnson, (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Opinion

quinn emanuel trial lawyers | new york 51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor, New York, NY 10010 | TEL (212)-849-7000 WRITER'S DIAL NO. (212)849-7000 WRITER'S EMAIL ADDRESS courtneywhang@quinnemanuel.com April 26, 2024 Hon. Jesse M. Furman United States District Court 40 Centre Street, Room 2202 New York, NY 10007 Re: ChemImage Corp. v. Johnson & Johnson et al., No. 1:24-CV-2646 (JMF) Letter Motion For Leave to Seal Dear Judge Furman: We represent Plaintiff ChemImage Corporation (“ChemImage”) and write pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(d), this Court’s Standing Order 19-MC-583, and Rule 7(C) of the Court’s Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases to respectfully seek leave to seal Plaintiff’s contemporaneously filed Letter Motion for Leave as well as the attachments thereto. Defendants Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc. join this request. On April 4, 2024, ChemImage filed a Motion for Leave to File Complaint Under Seal, which was granted on April 5, 2024. See 1:24-MC-00618-LTS, Dkt. 3 (Order on Motion for Leave to File Complaint Under Seal). The Order also required the parties to “confer on whether further redactions can be removed for a permanent, public filing.” Id. Pursuant to that Order, ChemImage filed its Complaint and exhibit under seal, and filed a public version of the Complaint and exhibit containing redactions. See Dkt. 1. Consistent with the Court’s Order, the parties conferred on April 18, 2024 and agreed to remove nearly all of the redactions from the permanent public version of the Complaint and exhibit. Defendants Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, however, requested redactions of the cash consideration and milestone payment and royalty amounts, those redactions being narrowly tailored to protect competitive business information that courts routinely seal. See, e.g., Regeneron Pharms., Inc. v. Novartis Pharma AG, No. 1:20-cv-05502, 2021 WL 243943, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 25, 2021). Plaintiff consents to the proposed redactions and the Parties now seek to file a permanent public version of the Complaint with those limited redactions. Plaintiff respectfully requests the Court seal its Letter Motion for Leave as well as the attachments thereto.

Respectfully submitted, /s/ Courtney C. Whan Application GRANTED. Based on a review of the proposed redactions the Complaint and its attachment, see ECF Nos. 15-1, 15-2, 15-3, 15-4, 1 Courtney C. Whang Court finds that the proposed redactions are narrowly tailored to further interests that are sufficient to outweigh the presumption in favor of publ access. Accordingly, the application is granted, subject to reconsideratio the event that any party or third party files a motion to unseal a particula document or documents. Plaintiff shall file the redacted version of the Complaint and its attachment on the public docket within two business The Clerk of Court is directed to place ECF No. 1 under seal (1.e., with viewing restricted to the Court and parties), and to terminate ECF Nos. | and 15.

SO ORDERED. Ope ( 2024

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
ChemImage Corporation v. Johnson & Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chemimage-corporation-v-johnson-johnson-nysd-2024.