Chemical Release at Bogalusa, No. 73,341, D Div. C v. Gaylord Chemical Corp.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Chemical Release at Bogalusa, No. 73,341, D Div. C v. Gaylord Chemical Corp.

699 So. 2d 77, 1997 La. LEXIS 2521, 1997 WL 563219

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedSeptember 5, 1997

DocketNo. 97-CC-2160

StatusPublished

This text of 699 So. 2d 77 (Chemical Release at Bogalusa, No. 73,341, D Div. C v. Gaylord Chemical Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chemical Release at Bogalusa, No. 73,341, D Div. C v. Gaylord Chemical Corp., 699 So. 2d 77, 1997 La. LEXIS 2521, 1997 WL 563219 (La. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Plaintiffs’ Liaison Comm.; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW97 1726; Parish of Washington, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 73,341.

Granted. Judgment of the court of appeal is vacated and set aside. The order of the trial court was in accordance with previous direction of the court of appeal to place evidence in the record on the adequacy of class representation. See Cotton v. Gaylord Container, 96-1958 (La.App. 1st Cir. 3/27/97), 691 So.2d 760, writs denied, 97-0800, 0830 (La. 4/8/97), 693 So.2d 147. Any issues relating to the relevance or prejudicial effect of specific information may be resolved by the trial court during the hearing. La.Code Evid. arts. 402 and 403. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is reinstated, and the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

JOHNSON, J., would deny the writ. LEMMON, J. not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Plaintiffs’ Liaison Comm.; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW97 1726; Parish of Washington, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 73,341.

Granted. Judgment of the court of appeal is vacated and set aside. The order of the trial court was in accordance with previous direction of the court of appeal to place evidence in the record on the adequacy of class representation. See Cotton v. Gaylord Container, 96-1958 (La.App. 1st Cir. 3/27/97), 691 So.2d 760, writs denied, 97-0800, 0830 (La. 4/8/97), 693 So.2d 147. Any issues relating to the relevance or prejudicial effect of specific information may be resolved by the trial court during the hearing. La.Code Evid. arts. 402 and 403. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is reinstated, and the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

JOHNSON, J., would deny the writ. LEMMON, J. not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

699 So. 2d 77, 1997 La. LEXIS 2521, 1997 WL 563219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chemical-release-at-bogalusa-no-73341-d-div-c-v-gaylord-chemical-la-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack