Chemical Bank v. Queen Wire & Nail Inc.
This text of 440 N.E.2d 1339 (Chemical Bank v. Queen Wire & Nail Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[772]*772Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order which affirmed an order denying defendants’ motion to resettle the record on appeal, dismissed upon the ground that the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 39, p 159); motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied. Twenty dollars costs and necessary reproduction disbursements to plaintiff-respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
440 N.E.2d 1339, 57 N.Y.2d 771, 454 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chemical-bank-v-queen-wire-nail-inc-ny-1982.