Chemical Bank v. Public Utility District No. 1
471 U.S. 1075, 105 S. Ct. 2154
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 29, 1985·No. No. 84-1258·Published·Cited by 9 cases
Opinion
Sup. Ct. Wash. Motions of Salomon Brothers, Inc., et al., American Bankers Association et al., Public Securities Association, American Association of Retired Persons, and National WPPSS 4 and 5 Bondholders’ Committee for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chemical Bank v. Public Utility District No. 1, 471 U.S. 1075, 105 S. Ct. 2154 (1985).
471 U.S. 1075 (Chemical Bank v. Public Utility District No. 1) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
PBA Tour Gear, Inc. v. Professional Bowlers Ass'n (In Re PBA Tour Gear, Inc.)
301 B.R. 387 (E.D. New York, 2003)
Greaves v. Medical Imaging System, Inc.
879 P.2d 276 (Washington Supreme Court, 1994)
Class v. Schlesinger
19 F.3d 1306 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Co. v. Town of Danvers
411 Mass. 39 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1991)
MASSACHUSETTS MUNICIPAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC v. Danvers
577 N.E.2d 283 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1991)
In Re Washington Public Power Supply System Securities Litigation
779 F. Supp. 1063 (D. Arizona, 1990)
Lundstrom, Inc. v. Nikkei Concerns, Inc.
758 P.2d 561 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1988)
Hull Municipal Lighting Plant v. Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Co.
506 N.E.2d 140 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1987)