Chemical Bank v. Herman

305 N.E.2d 778, 33 N.Y.2d 800, 350 N.Y.S.2d 657, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 931
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 21, 1973
StatusPublished

This text of 305 N.E.2d 778 (Chemical Bank v. Herman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chemical Bank v. Herman, 305 N.E.2d 778, 33 N.Y.2d 800, 350 N.Y.S.2d 657, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 931 (N.Y. 1973).

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs to all parties appearing separately and filing separate briefs payable out of the trust, in the following memorandum: The court bases its conclusion that no trust was created in 1931 on the fact that there was then no acceptance of any trust. The court is not required to and does not reach the issue whether there was a failure to establish effectively a trust res by substitute documentation and delivery of the substitute document to a third person.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Breitel, Jasek, Garrielli, Jokes and Wachtler.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
305 N.E.2d 778, 33 N.Y.2d 800, 350 N.Y.S.2d 657, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 931, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chemical-bank-v-herman-ny-1973.